In
frustration someone took a commenter to task by asking if the commenter had
ever made their feelings known directly to their respective government.
Interesting
question!
If
someone has something to say about their government then why wouldn’t they make
their feelings and concerns known directly to their government?
● At
the time I didn’t really take the question very serious. I had made my concerns
known to city officials several times with a modicum of success. On three occasions
I even went before city council. I discovered that if you broach a subject that
does not please them they usually listen politely and not ask any questions or
offer follow-up. I surmise that they are content to quickly get you out of the
view of the publicly televised cameras.
● I
also took my concerns to our Niagara Regional Council on matters concerning
such things as illegal dumping of garbage along with over two thousand pictures
ranging from household waste to toxic pollution. The councilors reacted only to
the pictures of piles of garbage and toxic pollutants behind the new hospital.
● On
August 22, 2012 we followed the advice Niagara’s ‘Watersmart’ program by
reporting a serious toxic pollution the wording of which has now been changed: http://www.regional.niagara.on.ca/search/default.aspx?TextBox1=watersmart
The
details of our unsuccessful attempt to find anyone at the Region who might be
interested enough to reply without serious prompting can be followed here: http://newsalertniagara.blogspot.ca/2012/11/watersmart-niagara-how-does-that-work.html
●You
might well ask why I’ve changed, why I have developed a new opinion about the
concept of presenting one’s concerns to government. I suppose the change
manifested itself following my last attempt to make my feelings and concerns
known to the Niagara Regional Government.
It seems that the change had its origin
following my presentation
made at the November 28, 2012 Integrated Community Planning Committee meeting
in reference to the expense and futility of hiring another bureaucrat as an
Integrity Commissioner.
I found that the most egregious
aspect of my efforts was the subsequent attempt to try to prevent my
presentation from ever seeing the light of day through the labeling of my
presentation by Regional Councilor Dave Augustyn and Mayor of Pelham as ‘so full of errors’ that it should not be accepted into
the record. When the Regional authorities discovered that the presentation was
not going to be covered up they even gave their councilors misinformation and
excuses, which can be viewed in the full stories at: http://www.niagarawinnerscircle.com/Niagara-Region-MEMORANDUM.html
And
Following the clerk’s claim the
Ontario Ombudsman gave the region a clean bill of health I naturally emailed
the Ombudsman’s office to which I received the following clarification.
Date: 2012-09-12
The Ombudsman
found ‘that the Regional Municipality of Niagara's notice practice for
advisory committee meetings did not comply with its Procedure By-Law in that
agendas were not posted on the website prior to meetings. Although the
complaint that improper voting within Committee meetings was not proven, the
Ombudsman found that the Corporate Services Committee and Council could have
been more transparent in their decision making, and in terms of reporting back
publicly on what transpired in the closed meetings.’
So much for the clerk’s claim that it proves the region is open
and transparent.
In the end the Niagara Regional Government succeeded in preventing
my presentation from being received into the public record thus depriving the
public the ability to assess their caliber and character.
Upon a recorded vote being
requested on the Presenting Concerns to Government motion regarding receiving Mr. Haskell’s presentation
respecting the Integrity Commissioner, the members were divided as follows on
the motion:
Voting For the Motion:
Voting Against the Motion:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment