Now where have I heard that phrase before? Oh yes! We wrote that very same phrase in a previous article under the Title; Crime against Humanity.
.
It is totally understandable that people are confused by misinformation and outright lies. In our article titled; Crime against Humanity we posted a graph published by STATSCAN, the authority that we are expected to follow for correct statistics. There are other graphs and charts showing the same results but apparently our fearless leaders prefer their own never ending rhetoric of hell and damnation. 
.
While other societies are opening up our 'Canada the Good' is physically assaulting Canadian Citizens and smashing into and barricading our churches, all the while condemning China for 'Crimes Against Humanity! 
.
..
When the Citizens start to show their displeasure with the never-ending lockdowns they are publicly threatened by their Mayor and chastised by a failing media whose local newspaper reporter mingled in the 'risky crowd' of freedom fighters without a mask.
.
Is there any chance that the experts can tell us what to expect if the stay-at-home lockdown fails to slow Covid-19 since none of their brilliant prognosis has been accurate?
.
The sad political driven commentary manifests itself when in the middle of the news story the reporter attacks a Conservative Mayor for stating his 'free speech opinion'.
.
Proof of corruption is evident when our 'Leaders of Dubious Distinction' raise their own pay, while their constituents lose everything!
Google to comment under each and every 'News Alert Niagara' article.
Predicated on 'Free Speech' our articles are available for your free use!
Don't forget to click on the blue Links for the rest of the story!
.
Please Share Your Thoughts !
Yeah, you've got a massive typo in your ebook ad. You wrote "... to flush and and expos corruption". While I understand that the "expos" played great baseball in Montreal for several years, the word you're looking for in the AD you're plastering all over the net is "EXPOSE".
ReplyDeleteThe supreme court of Canada commented upon Property Rights in Canadian law as follows:
ReplyDeleteAngie - Canadian jurisprudence has traditionally recognized, as a fundamental freedom, the right of the individual to the enjoyment of property and the right not to be deprived thereof, of any interest therein, save by due process of law.
Section 26 of the charter stipulates that:
The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights and freedoms that exist in Canada.
Case law has construed this section to mean that the common law protection of Property Rights is at least not threatened by the Charter. Only the inclusion of property in the Charter, however, would enable an individual whose property rights have been infringed to have recourse to the enforcement section of the Charter. Subsection 24(1) states in part that “[a]nyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court… to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.”
The supreme court of Canada commented upon Property Rights in Canadian law as follows:
ReplyDeleteAngie - Canadian jurisprudence has traditionally recognized, as a fundamental freedom, the right of the individual to the enjoyment of property and the right not to be deprived thereof, of any interest therein, save by due process of law.
Section 26 of the charter stipulates that:
The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights and freedoms that exist in Canada.
Case law has construed this section to mean that the common law protection of Property Rights is at least not threatened by the Charter. Only the inclusion of property in the Charter, however, would enable an individual whose property rights have been infringed to have recourse to the enforcement section of the Charter. Subsection 24(1) states in part that “[a]nyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court… to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.”
The supreme court of Canada commented upon Property Rights in Canadian law as follows:
ReplyDeleteAngie - Canadian jurisprudence has traditionally recognized, as a fundamental freedom, the right of the individual to the enjoyment of property and the right not to be deprived thereof, of any interest therein, save by due process of law.
Section 26 of the charter stipulates that:
The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights and freedoms that exist in Canada.
Case law has construed this section to mean that the common law protection of Property Rights is at least not threatened by the Charter. Only the inclusion of property in the Charter, however, would enable an individual whose property rights have been infringed to have recourse to the enforcement section of the Charter. Subsection 24(1) states in part that “[a]nyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court… to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.”
Property Rights and the Constitution
ReplyDeleteDavid Johansen
Law and Government Division
October 1991