.
.
The defining message in our article was: 'we proffered a solution'. We felt confident that the message would get through to the committee that there might, just Might be a positive avenue of attack leading to a solution to abhorrent City-wide Graffiti Scribble.
.
It came as a surprise that following council's great effort, not to mention the expense, of 2 hours of graffiti deliberation that 'News Alert Niagara' would receive not a single response from those we have hired and elected.
.
Possibly something went wrong. Possibly a mistake. So on March 5, 2020 we resent the article to our City Council. We not only resent the Article but, as is our custom, we sent it with 'Request Read Receipt'!
Nope! No mistake!
.
Very difficult for a group such as a City Council to in-unison black out email correspondence.
Had to be a deliberate censoring of public email. Any administration who would stoop to deciding what an elected official can or cannot read is an administration that would stoop to anything!
.
Nope! No mistake!
.
Very difficult for a group such as a City Council to in-unison black out email correspondence.
Had to be a deliberate censoring of public email. Any administration who would stoop to deciding what an elected official can or cannot read is an administration that would stoop to anything!
.
Lets talk integrity.
.
News Alert Niagara does not for one minute believe that every single councilor decided in unison to block our email.
.
News Alert Niagara charges that the City of St. Catharines has immorally and unlawfully interfered with the right to email our councilors and/or for our elected councilors to be denied.
It is inconceivable that our elected officials would countenance the censorship of their incoming email! On the other hand they don't know what to do about Graffiti Scribble!
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment