The Chicken Thief

There once was a man standing trial accused of stealing chickens when in conclusion the judge told him that due to the lack of evidence the man was aquitted.

The bewildered accused replied: "Does that mean I have to give them back?" 
.
Question: Does that mean the acquitted chicken thief would be required to give the chickens back?
.

Well now we finally have a definitive 'Supreme Court' decision stating that the imposition of a 'Victim Surcharge' is 'UNCONSTITUTIONAL' under our 'Charter of Rights'.
.
Does this definitive 'Supreme Court' decision mean that the moneys 'stolen' will have to be given Back?
.
For those that follow such things the Case #37782; 37783; 37774; 37427 between 

Alex Boudreault v. Her Majesty The Queen 
.

https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5226312?fbclid=IwAR2HKaHP4v8kqfYZK1lFtdkoUIyUgl73HdDINGPHeYFwY1hYm5S82U2-Vww

.

https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2018/2018scc58/2018scc58.html?autocompleteStr=R.%20v.%20Boudreault&autocompletePos=2  

PS: It appears that with so many Citizens challenging the 'Chicken Thieves' 
one might conclude that the 'Chickens are coming home to roost'
.

Click HERE to protect your private property from predatory Bureaucrats