The
“Climate Emergency” – Is it really an emergency or merely a political move?
It may be
that some might accuse me of being a “climate denier” and I will take that with
a grain of salt as it seems everyone knows the “climate” changes. But isn’t it time to speak some real “truth
to power”? This is about the rhetoric
Canadians are being fed by the Federal government.
The Federal
government is on the brink of passing a motion to implement a “climate
emergency.” But what the Federal
government is not telling Canadians is that if they do implement this purported
“emergency” they also can implement a number of other things.
Then there
are the purported experts saying Canada is warming twice as fast as the rest of the world. According to reports the UK, Sweden,
Switzerland, etc., are as well. So, how
can any 2 countries be warming faster than any other country? (Minister McKenna – climate, pollution,
carbon “knows no borders,” or whatever the “word of the day” is). If all of these countries are warming faster
than any others, at the same time, doesn't that say their information is in
conflict with the others?
The
concern for Canadians should be that our Federal government is looking to
implement forms of martial law. That’s
what happens with government uses “emergency powers.” It’s under the “Emergencies Act.” This should be frightening to all Canadians
as there is doubt that it is truly needed.
Not to mention that the Court of Appeals, in the Saskatchewan, has
already ruled on this.
“4. The
emergency power
[200] Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, David Suzuki Foundation, and Intergenerational Climate Coalition submit the Act can be sustained under the “emergency” branch of the POGG power. …
[201] The intervenors contend that the national peril posed by climate change is an emergency … David Suzuki Foundation analogizes the Act to war-time powers, saying that neither wars nor climate change run on fixed timetables. …
[200] Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, David Suzuki Foundation, and Intergenerational Climate Coalition submit the Act can be sustained under the “emergency” branch of the POGG power. …
[201] The intervenors contend that the national peril posed by climate change is an emergency … David Suzuki Foundation analogizes the Act to war-time powers, saying that neither wars nor climate change run on fixed timetables. …
[202] These arguments cannot prevail. … However, the factual
record before the Court cannot sustain a view that the climate change challenge
is in any way short run or that the Act is intended to have, or is expected to
have, a life of limited duration. This is unlike wars as typically understood.
…”
Are Canadians prepared for Martial Law? It would seem that there are more questions,
than answers, regarding the information the Federal government is disseminating
and creating this law under. Is this
what Canadians elected, our government, to do? So, the question – Is this truly
a “climate emergency” or is this merely a political move by a political party
to get their own way? Remember SNC and
Wernick stating that Trudeau will get it done “one way or another”?
Director of Research Ontario Landowners Association
Author – "Property Rights 101: An Introduction”
Board Member/Secretary – Canadian Justice Review Board
Legal Research – Green and Associates Law Offices, etc.,
Legislative Researcher – MPs, MPPs, Municipal Councilors,
President All Rights Research Ltd.,
I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.
Editor's belief that $Climate Change$ is just another Tax Grab from a Corrupt Government!!!
Climate emergency is a farce for governments to collect innocent taxpayers's money.
ReplyDelete