Who committed criminal mischief under color of law? Bad actors of the Niagara Regional Council!
How did the bad actors of Niagara Regional Council carry out their Criminal Mischief under color of law? By feigning a need to call an in camera session in the middle of a council meeting forcing a packed gallery to stand outside with no available seating, while the bad actors deliberated for a full hour!
What was the criminal mischief committed under the color of law? Criminal mischief was committed by an elected bad actor placing a hat over a live recording device to claim a reporter was intent on recording an in camera meeting!
Why would bad actors of the Niagara Regional Council criminally target a reporter? Because the reporter was continually exposing unbecoming activities of elected bad actors!
Who were the bad actors of the Niagara Regional Council? In this case the bad actors were primarily an inordinate overload of double dipping Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) board members on our Niagara Regional Council whose conduct grew so bad that the Province had to step in to curb their activities! Even the Region's CAO was the head of the NPCA and who assaulted a reporter by violently pushing the reporter's camera into the reporter's face because the reporter photographed a public speaker in a public venue in a public building!
A compilation of the reporter's expose` of the NPCA abuse of innocent property owners can be viewed here! https://newsalertniagara.blogspot.com/2018/11/a-study-in-elected-corruption-update-8.html
Why did the bad actors of the Niagara Regional Council NOT SUCCEED in getting the reporter arrested? The bad actors of the Niagara Regional Council failed in their criminal mischief because of their own in house video which showed (at the 135 minute mark) that the reporter had left the media desk with the camera still resting on hat; NOT covering the recorder!
What have you done about the bad actors of the Niagara Regional Council? Well, I started by asking for my stolen property back following up with sending the Region a bill for holding my stolen property. Finally, in June 2021, I commenced a lawsuit in an attempt to recover my stolen property!
It is ludicrous that in the face of so many people having already heard the recording it is incredible and an absolute 'obstruction of justice' that my lawyers and the courts are denied access.
Letter from Mickey Cruickshank to my Lawyer
Re: The Regional Municipality of Niagara et al ats. Haskell Court File No: 5623/19 recently advised by my client, Niagara Region Police, that your client has been contacting them regarding the above-noted matter. He has again reported the incident requesting an investigation regarding this matter despite the fact that he has already commenced litigation regarding same.
He has also made statements to my client the he will be publishing an article about the subject incident.
I trust that you were not aware of this, and that you can speak to your client regarding the impropriety of trying to pursue his interests in his lawsuit directly with my client and without your involvement.
Yours truly, Mickey Cruickshank Legal Counsel
.
Dear Mr. Cruickshank,
I want you to know that my informing YOUR CLIENT the NRP of a possible 'Obstruction of Justice Crime' is my civic duty and more importantly, my right and has nothing to do with my lawsuit against the Region!
Furthermore Mr. Cruickshank, it is incumbent upon me to let the voters know what the Regional chair has been up too before they vote!
Perhaps you can speak to your NRP client regarding the impropriety of ignoring valid information concerning criminal acts or even carrying information back to the perpetrator!
Yours Truly, Preston Haskell
Who was involved with the criminal mischief of covering the recorder with the hat? The detective on the incident interviewed the only person, Councilor Sandy Annunciata, former Chair of the NPCA Board, who claimed he found the recorder under the hat! I tried in vain to obtain the the detective's ridiculous interview with Annunziata from the NRP but I was denied!
Why was the recorder left running? At the time the reporter left the Chamber for the washroom facilities the Council had not yet decided to go in camera! In fact Councilor Rigby had already gave plausible reasons that in camera was NOT necessary as can be witnessed on the video!
According to Ontario's Ombudsman, the bad actors of the Niagara Regional Council got away with 'Criminal Mischief' and now they are getting away with 'Obstruction of Justice'!
Predicated on 'Free Speech' our articles are always available for your free use!
Don't forget to click on the blue Links for the rest of the story!
https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/opp-reveals-how-it-is-enforcing-ontario-s-stay-at-home-order-1.5268877
ReplyDeleteOPP reveals how it is enforcing Ontario's stay-at-home order
Published Friday, January 15, 2021 4:14PM EST
Last Updated Friday, January 15, 2021 4:46PM EST
TORONTO -- The Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) has articulated how they are enforcing the provincial government's stay-at-home order a day after the new rules went into effect.
In a news release, the OPP asked residents to “voluntarily comply” with the enhanced public health measures aimed at curbing the spread of COVID-19 in the province while explaining how officers will carry out the orders.
Primarily, the OPP says officers will focus on non-compliance in businesses and restaurants, complaints from the public and outdoor gatherings of more than five people.
Operating under the province’s Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act (EMPCA) and the Reopening Ontario Act (ROA), the OPP says officers can disperse and ticket individuals found to be in contravention with the acts.
“Fines are $750 for failing to comply with an order and/or $1,000 for preventing others (including individuals, employees or other workers) from following an order,” the news release reads.
“Maximum fines for individuals are up $100,000 and $10 million for a corporation. Failure to follow the rules can result in prosecution or jail time.”
Those fines aren’t new, but the powers of those who distribute them are.
Earlier this week, when the order was first announced, Premier Doug Ford said that all enforcement and provincial offences officers, including the OPP, local police forces, BYLAW OFFICERS officers, and provincial workplace inspectors, would now have the authority to issue to tickets as they see fit.
Confusion followed the release of those measures, with many wondering if the order meant police could now randomly stop residents who they felt were breaking the rules.
However, a spokesperson for Solicitor General Sylvia Jones later confirmed to CTV News Toronto that the order does not give police the power to enter homes or stop vehicles solely to check if the measure is being followed.
Following the province’s lead, police in Toronto and Peel Region said yesterday that their goal would be to enforce the order based on complaints while advising residents to remain at home.
The OPP doubled down on that messaging, underscoring that “officers will not arbitrarily stop an individual or a vehicle or enter a dwelling for the singular purpose of checking compliance with the order.”
“Individuals are not expected to provide proof of essential work. Officers can ask an individual to identify themselves if they have reasonable grounds to believe the individual is violating an act,” the OPP said.
At the same time, the OPP asked residents with questions related to the stay-at-home order to visit covid-19.ontario.ca/zones-and-restrictions instead of calling 911.
MEANWHILE IT IS THE BY-LAW OFFICERS THAT BROUGHT- THEMSELVES, POLICE AND WORKERS ONTO MY PROPERTY DURING MANDATORY STAY AT HOME ORDER AND STOLE EVERYTHING OFF MY PROPERTY. I WAS ALSO PHYSICALLY ASSAULTED IN FRONT OF THE POLICE, (WHO BROKE IT UP) AND THEY DID NOT LAY CHARGES OR HAVE THEM REMOVED FROM PROPERTY.